Empirical tests of large-scale collaborative recall
نویسندگان
چکیده
Much of our knowledge is transmitted socially rather than through firsthand experience. Even our memories depend on recollections of those around us. Surprisingly, when people recall memories with others, they do not reach the potential number of items they could have recalled alone. This phenomenon is called collaborative inhibition. Recently, Luhmann and Rajaram (2015) analyzed the dynamics of collaborative inhibition at scale with an agent-based model, extrapolating from previous small-scale laboratory experiments. We tested their model against human data collected in a large-scale experiment and found that participants demonstrate non-monotonicities not evident in these predictions. We next analyzed memory transmission beyond directly interacting agents by placing agents into networks. Contrary to model predictions, we observed high similarity only within directly interacting pairs. By comparing behavior to model predictions in large-scale experiments, we reveal unexpected results that motivate future work in elucidating the algorithms underlying collaborative memory.
منابع مشابه
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
In two experiments, we examined age differences in collaborative inhibition (reduced recall in pairs of people, relative to pooled individuals) across repeated retrieval attempts. Younger and older adults studied categorized word lists and were then given two consecutive recall tests and a recognition test. On the first recall test, the subjects were given free-report cued recall or forced-repo...
متن کاملRunning head: MECHANISMS UNDERLYING COLLABORATIVE INHIBITION
250 words) Although a group of people working together remembers more than any one individual, they recall less than their predicted potential. This finding is known as collaborative inhibition, and is generally thought to arise due to retrieval disruption. However, there is growing evidence that is inconsistent with the retrieval disruption account, suggesting that additional mechanisms also c...
متن کاملWhy two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
Although a group of people working together remembers more than any one individual, they recall less than their predicted potential. This finding is known as collaborative inhibition and is generally thought to arise due to retrieval disruption. However, there is growing evidence that is inconsistent with the retrieval disruption account, suggesting that additional mechanisms also contribute to...
متن کاملPersonality-Aware Collaborative Filtering: An Empirical Study in Multiple Domains with Facebook Data
In this paper we investigate the incorporation of information about the users’ personality into a number of collaborative filtering methods, aiming to address situations of user preference scarcity. Through empirical experiments on a multi-domain dataset obtained from Facebook, we show that the proposed personality-aware collaborative filtering methods effectively –and consistently in the studi...
متن کاملEvaluation of Updating Methods in Building Blocks Dataset
With the increasing use of spatial data in daily life, the production of this data from diverse information sources with different precision and scales has grown widely. Generating new data requires a great deal of time and money. Therefore, one solution is to reduce costs is to update the old data at different scales using new data (produced on a similar scale). One approach to updating data i...
متن کامل